Describe the method of analysis, using the article and Chapter 3 of Theoretical Basis for Nursing.
Question description
Select a peer-reviewed concept analysis article of your choice and write a response of 1,000–1,250 words. Use the following guidelines:
- Include an introduction.
- Describe the method of analysis, using the article and Chapter 3 of Theoretical Basis for Nursing.
- Describe the steps of process and the results for each step.
- Apply the concept to a practice situation.
- Include a conclusion.
Prepare this assignment according to guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric (CHECK BELOW). Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
RUBRIC
Benchmark Assignment – Application of Concept Analysis to Clinical Practice
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less Than Satisfactory 80.00% |
3 Satisfactory 88.00% |
4 Good 92.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70.0 %Content | ||||||
| 5.0 %Introduction | Introduction is either not present or not evident to the reader. | Introduction is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear, and paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Introduction is present but lacks clarity and/or depth. | Introduction is clear, forecasting development of paper. | Introduction is comprehensive; reader knows exactly what to expect. | |
| 30.0 %Description of method, steps in process, and results using the chosen article and chapter 3 of the textbook. | Description of method, steps in process, and results using the chosen article and chapter 3 of the textbook is either not present or not evident to the reader. | Description of method, steps in process, and results using the chosen article and chapter 3 of the textbook is present, but is vague or insufficiently developed. | Addresses the primary elements of the concept but fails to paint a clear picture of the concept analysis. | Primary elements of the concept are present and evident to the reader. Clear picture of concept analysis can be easily detected by the reader. | Thoroughly presents all of the information to portray a clear chronology as well as richness of detail. | |
| 30.0 %Application to Practice | Application to practice is either not present or not evident to the reader. | Application to practice is present but insufficiently developed. | Application to practice is present but development is cursory and lacks depth. | Application to practice is evident to the reader. Arguments are cogent to thesis and support claims. | Thoroughly presents the application to practice with rich detail and supporting arguments. | |
| 5.0 %Conclusion | Conclusion is either not present or not evident to the reader. | Conclusion is insufficiently developed and/or vague and lacks any discernible purpose. | Conclusion is present, but statements lack depth of understanding. | Conclusion is clear and identifies key ideas regarding application of the concept to practice. | Conclusion is comprehensive and paints a clear picture of the application concept to practice. | |
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
| 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |
| 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
| 10.0 %Format | ||||||
| 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
| 5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) | No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. | |
| 100 %Total Weightage | ||||||
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
